The
enfant terrible of Indian politics, the
darling of a million Gujaratis, the bete noire of L.K. Advani and Rahul Gandhi , the man Who will not be
Named by
muslims pan India, the collective
hope of an educated, frustrated, beleagured middle class, Narendra Modi , the man ,not the enigma, is no
stranger to controversy. Some say he creates controversy whilst his admirers, a
growing legion , say he meets controversy
headlong. The amused fence sitters, not many in Modi’s case , say he is only
following what a President in United States of America, ironically a country
that he is denied access to, said many years back: If an individual wants to
be a leader and isn’t controversial ,that means he never stood for anything. This from an unrepentant Nixon , himself no stranger to controversy, who had piously intoned at the outbreak of the
Watergate Scandal,” I am no crook”, prompting many to do a rethink on the definition of that five
letter word. Modi, however, has been spared the blushes at being called a
crook. Used to much harsher and damming invectives he ripostes a, “someone
is driving a car and we’re sitting behind, even if a puppy comes under the
wheels, will it be painful or not? Of course it will. Chief minister or not,
I’m a human being. If something bad happens anywhere, it is natural to be sad.”
What made Modi talk about hapless puppies ? Was it an off the
cuff remark or an oblique reference to India ’s
minority community? Well, only he, and maybe Amit Shah, can tell but what comes
out clearly is that Modi has the propensity of most of the famous, and some not
so famous to shoot their mouth off, or , as some put it rather indelicately, to
put their foot in their mouth. The
latter syndrome attached itself like a limpet to a forever bemused Prince
Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. His state visit to China
in 1986 became memorably famous for the uproar his comment to British students
studying in China
caused. An
unrepentant Prince Philip defended his remark,
'If you stay here much longer you will all be slitty-eyed', with
the indefensible , ‘The Chinese didn’t
mind it, so why should anyone else”.
Nursing a hangover of the Raj , in another incident more than 13 years
later, showing that royal consorts grow older but no wiser, he told an Indian
businessman, Atul Patel: 'There's a lot
of your family in tonight,' The ‘
tonight ‘ was a 400-strong Buckingham
Palace reception for British Indians in October 2009.
In India ,
our very own First Family has made sincere efforts to keep the junta entertained
and cartoonists employed. So , if we have a memorable
"hum haarein ya loose-ein" and an even better, albeit belligerent,
"nani yaad dila denge” from Rajiv Gandhi , we also have equally charming howlers from the dimpled
prince. From chidingly calling the U.P bhaiyyas in amchi Maharashtra ‘ beggars’ to diagnosing confidently that 7 out
of 10 youth in Punjab are on drugs, to
confessing with disarming candour
that it is “very difficult to prevent every terror attack" Rahul Gandhi has left no stone unturned in ensuring
that the country knows exactly what it is in for, come 2014.
Advani however, did not anticipate what was in store
for him when, in a burst of misguided
inspiration , he called
Jinnah a secular
leader. This, coming from the
leader of a party which had always positioned itself for a hindutva which
stood against the partition of India and which blamed Jinnah for his role
in the partition , naturally raised a
storm which refused to die down and only subsided when a suitably chastised
Advani became party to a one-page resolution blaming
Jinnah for the Partition and the violence that followed.
No comments:
Post a Comment